It goes to where it belongs.

Congratulations to Barcelona.  They were far, far superior than Manchester United.  In the end, it was the stringent discipline of Iniesta and Xavi that allowed Barca to grow throughout the game, and eventually lead to Messi (above) to play in his own devastating fashion.  BBC Sport will have seemingly unending coverage over the next few days, attempting to find out why Manchester United lost - but at the end of the day, it was because they weren't good enough.

Clayton's Story

A powerful short film.  Worth the watch.  

HT: Between Two Worlds

MP's Expenses: Some Thoughts

For more than two weeks now, the only news item has been MP's expenses (one could wonder what happened to the swine flu pandemic that was about to hit us...perhaps we are more driven by the media than we realise, or care).  

Gordon Brown follows David Cameron again in offering an apology for the scandal with Nick Clegg following quickly behind. 

But what are they actually apologising for?  Is it that they are sinsearly sorry for the misdemeanors? Or are they sorry they have actually got caught.  Cameron apologised for the system - not the abuse of the system.  Is this indicative of our culture - taking blame away from people and placing it onto 'systems'.  Cameron, of course, has acted, which has a lot of guts in the current climate of inaction and excuse.

Let us take a closer look at the problem.

There are two issues:

-The system: a claims system that is far to easy to cheat, and a system that is encouraged by officials to be cheated on.

-The people who have taken advantage of the easy cheat in order to make an easy buck or two.

There was quite a debate on BBC Radio 4 on Sunday 10 May where all thought it was wrong but those calling in were split as to whether we should blame the MP's or the system.  "They are just humans..." when one caller, we shouldn't expect anything else!

Which from a Christian point of view is true - we are all sinners.  But is that an excuse?  Perhaps what is more of an issue is that it is the MP's who have created the system that allows them to abuse it.  But is it abuse?  Well, two things: firstly, we have to understand human nature.  When someone in authority tells you that you are able to claim more money than you currently are, and in fact you should be claiming more, how many of us would claim that we could dismiss that temptation out of hand? If we are being realistic, no-one would find it easy.  Secondly, the solution is obvious, but will not win votes.  MP's need to be paid more, it is as simple as that.  But we the public are far too fickle and condemning (especially towards those who we vote in to run our country) that any political leader who champions this cause will find themselves out of a job before they can finish the sentence, 'we need a pay rise'.  But - that is the way forward.  Pay them enough and remove the temptation... some will still abuse whatever system will be in place in a years time, but the majority will not.

We'll have to save the constitutional fiasco regarding the Speaker of the House for another day.

End.

The Dissertation is now in.  Both an anti-climax and a relief.  

If I were to recommend one book to read following my dissertation, it would be this one:

Peter Holmes - Trinity in Human Community.

Easy to read, accessible and earthed in the experience of his own church.

If I were to take one quote from my dissertation that has perhaps to most importance for how we understand who we are it would be this:

"Jesus is the human person properly for God and others, and therefore properly for Himself - both his relations and his identity are undistorted.  To be fully in God's image, to make a right response to God and others, is therefore to be conformed to Christ."  -- McFadyen, The Call to Personhood, p. 46-7.

It was an edifying experience writing the dissertation.  I'd recommend it.